![]() While the Evos gave me a bit more in a couple areas, the Gamut was excellent across the board. In comparison the Gamut seems a little lean, but only in comparison. Also, the low bass on the Evos is fuller and feels deeper, more fleshed out-not more impact but more color. It's more intimate, more of a sense of 'reach-out-and-touch.' The Evos do this better than the Gamut. Some have mentioned a similarity of the Evos and SET amps (I know it's not really the same but there is a hint, a family resemblance, of the immediacy of a SET sound). Sound's near perfect-but-there are some things I miss that the Evos did very well. I don't cringe any more listening to Blanchard's trumpet or Turney's sax or Pidgeon's voice. Best of all, the ripeness through the mids is gone. Did I mention how quick things sound? Guitar and bass plucks sound incredible. There is more air and instuments are better placed in a wider soundstage, and a bit further back-and better layering. The musical information comes across faster and cleaner. This amp is more 'neutral' than the Evos. First some background.I've been using Bel Canto 200.2 monos for 1-2 years on (Talon Khoruses) and was generally satisfied, but bothered on occasion by an overly 'ripe' midband on some recordings, and especially sax and trumpet and some vocals.Īfter reading the TAS review I thought that maybe the Gamut D200 (original) could be just what the doctor ordered.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |